0.10/0.10	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.10/0.11	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.10/0.31	% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
0.10/0.31	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.31	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.31	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.10/0.31	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.10/0.31	% CPULimit   : 960
0.10/0.31	% WCLimit    : 120
0.10/0.31	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 01:54:50 EDT 2022
0.10/0.31	% CPUTime    : 
0.15/0.42	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.15/0.42	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.15/0.42	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.15/0.43	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.15/0.43	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.15/0.43	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores
0.15/0.43	# Starting new_bool_9 with 120s (1) cores
0.15/0.43	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores
0.15/0.43	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 120s (1) cores
0.15/0.43	# Starting post_as_ho2 with 120s (1) cores
0.15/0.43	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 120s (1) cores
0.15/0.43	# Starting full_lambda_10 with 120s (1) cores
0.15/0.43	# Starting new_ho_8 with 120s (1) cores
0.15/0.43	# post_as_ho12 with pid 922 completed with status 0
0.15/0.43	# Result found by post_as_ho12
0.15/0.43	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.15/0.43	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.15/0.43	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores
0.15/0.43	# No SInE strategy applied
0.15/0.43	# Search class: HHHNF-FFSF11-SSSFFSBN
0.15/0.43	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.15/0.43	# Starting new_ho_10 with 54s (1) cores
0.15/0.43	# new_ho_10 with pid 930 completed with status 0
0.15/0.43	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.15/0.43	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.15/0.43	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.15/0.43	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores
0.15/0.43	# No SInE strategy applied
0.15/0.43	# Search class: HHHNF-FFSF11-SSSFFSBN
0.15/0.43	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.15/0.43	# Starting new_ho_10 with 54s (1) cores
0.15/0.43	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.15/0.43	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.15/0.43	
0.15/0.43	# Proof found!
0.15/0.43	# SZS status Theorem
0.15/0.43	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.15/0.43	thf(decl_22, type, cP: $i > $o).
0.15/0.43	thf(decl_23, type, f: $i > $i).
0.15/0.43	thf(decl_24, type, cEQ: $i > $i > $o).
0.15/0.43	thf(decl_25, type, a: $i).
0.15/0.43	thf(decl_26, type, esk1_1: ($i > $o) > $i).
0.15/0.43	thf(cTHM304, conjecture, (?[X1:$i > $o]:((?[X2:$i]:((X1 @ X2))&![X3:$i]:(((cP @ X3)<=(X1 @ (f @ X3))))))<=(((![X3:$i]:((cEQ @ X3 @ X3))&![X4:$i, X2:$i]:(((cEQ @ (f @ X4) @ (f @ X2))=>(cEQ @ X4 @ X2))))&(cP @ a))&![X3:$i, X4:$i]:(((cP @ X4)<=((cEQ @ X3 @ X4)&(cP @ X3)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cTHM304)).
0.15/0.43	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(((((![X3:$i]:((cEQ @ X3 @ X3))&![X4:$i, X2:$i]:(((cEQ @ (f @ X4) @ (f @ X2))=>(cEQ @ X4 @ X2))))&(cP @ a))&![X3:$i, X4:$i]:((((cEQ @ X3 @ X4)&(cP @ X3))=>(cP @ X4))))=>?[X1:$i > $o]:((?[X2:$i]:((X1 @ X2))&![X3:$i]:(((X1 @ (f @ X3))=>(cP @ X3))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM304])])).
0.15/0.43	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X13:$i, X14:$i, X15:$i, X16:$i, X17:$i, X18:$i > $o, X19:$i]:((((((cEQ @ X13 @ X13)&(~(cEQ @ (f @ X14) @ (f @ X15))|(cEQ @ X14 @ X15)))&(cP @ a))&(~(cEQ @ X16 @ X17)|~(cP @ X16)|(cP @ X17)))&(((X18 @ (f @ (esk1_1 @ X18)))|~(X18 @ X19))&(~(cP @ (esk1_1 @ X18))|~(X18 @ X19))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])).
0.15/0.43	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $o, X2:$i]:(((X1 @ (f @ (esk1_1 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.15/0.43	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((cEQ @ X2 @ X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.15/0.43	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X3:$i]:(((cEQ @ X2 @ X3)|~((cEQ @ (f @ X2) @ (f @ X3))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.15/0.43	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((cEQ @ X2 @ (f @ (esk1_1 @ (cEQ @ X2))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])).
0.15/0.43	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i, X2:$i]:(((cP @ X3)|~((cEQ @ X2 @ X3))|~((cP @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.15/0.43	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((cEQ @ X2 @ (esk1_1 @ (cEQ @ (f @ X2))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])).
0.15/0.43	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $o, X2:$i]:((~((cP @ (esk1_1 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.15/0.43	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:(((cP @ (esk1_1 @ (cEQ @ (f @ X2))))|~((cP @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])).
0.15/0.43	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i, X2:$i]:((~((cEQ @ (f @ X2) @ X3))|~((cP @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])).
0.15/0.43	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (cP @ a), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.15/0.43	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:(~((cP @ X2))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_8])).
0.15/0.43	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13]), ['proof']).
0.15/0.43	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.15/0.43	# Parsed axioms                        : 5
0.15/0.43	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.15/0.43	# Initial clauses                      : 10
0.15/0.43	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 4
0.15/0.43	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 6
0.15/0.43	# Processed clauses                    : 19
0.15/0.43	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.15/0.43	# ...subsumed                          : 0
0.15/0.43	# ...remaining for further processing  : 19
0.15/0.43	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.15/0.43	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.15/0.43	# Backward-subsumed                    : 5
0.15/0.43	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.15/0.43	# Generated clauses                    : 18
0.15/0.43	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 9
0.15/0.43	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.15/0.43	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.15/0.43	# Paramodulations                      : 16
0.15/0.43	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.15/0.43	# NegExts                              : 0
0.15/0.43	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.15/0.43	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.15/0.43	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.15/0.43	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.15/0.43	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.15/0.43	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.15/0.43	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.15/0.43	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.15/0.43	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.15/0.43	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.15/0.43	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.15/0.43	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.15/0.43	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.15/0.43	# Current number of processed clauses  : 6
0.15/0.43	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
0.15/0.43	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.15/0.43	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.15/0.43	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
0.15/0.43	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
0.15/0.43	# ...number of literals in the above   : 2
0.15/0.43	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.15/0.43	# Current number of archived clauses   : 13
0.15/0.43	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6
0.15/0.43	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
0.15/0.43	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.15/0.43	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
0.15/0.43	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.15/0.43	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.15/0.43	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.15/0.43	# Condensation attempts                : 19
0.15/0.43	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.15/0.43	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 848
0.15/0.43	
0.15/0.43	# -------------------------------------------------
0.15/0.43	# User time                : 0.003 s
0.15/0.43	# System time              : 0.002 s
0.15/0.43	# Total time               : 0.005 s
0.15/0.43	# Maximum resident set size: 1740 pages
0.15/0.43	
0.15/0.43	# -------------------------------------------------
0.15/0.43	# User time                : 0.003 s
0.15/0.43	# System time              : 0.004 s
0.15/0.43	# Total time               : 0.007 s
0.15/0.43	# Maximum resident set size: 1780 pages
0.15/0.43	EOF